Publicación:
Implementing sociocultural interactive strategies to foster negotiation of meaning in oral tasks

dc.contributor.advisorRodríguez Bonces, Mónica Alisandraspa
dc.contributor.authorHernández Riaño, Julie MilenaFemenino
dc.contributor.authorGallego Espinosa, Víctor ManuelMasculino
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-24T15:43:54Z
dc.date.available2019-10-24T15:43:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-13
dc.description114 p.spa
dc.description.abstractEste documento presenta una investigación-acción cuyo objetivo fue analizar los efectos de las estrategias socioculturales e interactivas (Oxford, 2011), en la negociación de significado y a examinar las tácticas para negociar significado al implementar dichas estrategias. Los participantes fueron un grupo de 18 jóvenes de noveno grado de un colegio público ubicado al sur de Bogotá, Colombia. La implementación pedagógica propuesta adaptó el enfoque Basado en Tareas e integró las estrategias socioculturales e interactivas en el desarrollo de interacción oral. Los instrumentos de recolección de datos incluyeron notas de campo, un cuestionario semiestructurado y un registro de pensamiento en voz alta. Se usaron procedimientos de codificación abierta, axial y descriptivos para analizar los datos. Los resultados revelaron que el uso de estrategias socioculturales e interactivas en tareas de interacción oral fomentaron la negociación de significado. Los aprendices ganaron confianza para interactuar de manera oral en el idioma extranjero y las tácticas sirvieron como estímulo para que los estudiantes negociaran significado. Finalmente, mientras los estudiantes usaban diversas tácticas para negociar significado, el uso del español, como una de ellas, disminuyó.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThis paper reports on an action research that aims at analyzing the effects of Sociocultural Interactive strategies on students’ negotiation of meaning and at examining students’ tactics to negotiate meaning when implementing such strategies. Participants consisted of twelve female and six male ninth graders at a public school located at the South Bogotá, Colombia. The proposed pedagogical implementation adapted Task-Based Learning approach (TBL) and integrated Sociocultural Interactive strategies (Oxford, 2011), in the development of oral interaction. Data collection instruments included field notes, a semi-structured questionnaire, and a retrospective think aloud recording. Open, Axial, and Descriptive Coding procedures were used to analyze the data collected. The results revealed that the use of Sociocultural Interactive strategies in oral interaction tasks fostered negotiation of meaning. Learners gained confidence to interact orally in the foreign language and tactics served as a stimulus for learners to negotiate meaning. Finally, as learners involve in using varied strategy tactics to negotiate meaning, the use of Spanish, as one of them, diminished.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en didáctica del inglés para el aprendizaje autodirigidospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositoriosed.educacionbogota.edu.co/handle/001/2809
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidospa
dc.relation.referencesAl Hosni, S. S. R. (2014). EFL Learners’ Negotiation of Meaning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(1), 215-223.spa
dc.relation.referencesAllwright, D. (1998). Negotiation of Meaning. In K. Johnson & H. Johnson (Eds), Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesAngelo, T.A. (1993). A Teacher's Dozen: Fourteen General, Research-based Principles for Improving Higher Learning in Our Classrooms. AAHE Bulletin, 45(8).spa
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hallspa
dc.relation.referencesBogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston, Allyn and Bacon.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlake, R. (2000). Computer Mediated Communication. A Window on L2 Spanish Interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Routledgespa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, D., & Robayo, M. (2001). Improving speaking through role plays and dramatization. Profile Journal, 2, 12-15.spa
dc.relation.referencesChamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. http://doi.org/dq5mtsspa
dc.relation.referencesCheng, T. (2007). Taiwanese students' perceived English oral proficiency in relation to communication strategies (Order No. 3291873). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (304807644). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304807644?accountid=45375spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, A.D., 2003. The learner’s side of foreign language learning: where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? IRAL 41 (4), 279e291spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in Education (6th Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Francis & Taylor Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesCouncil of Europe (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publicationsspa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, C. (2011). Exploring knowledge of English speaking strategies in 8th and 12th graders. Profile Journal, 13, 85-98.spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, J. (2014). Implementing Social Strategies to Improve Speaking in Interaction Activities (Unpublished master's thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesDick, B. (2002) Convergent interviewing. Session 8 of Areol - action research and evaluation online.spa
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224-255). Oxford: Blackwellspa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (1988). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. John Wiley & Sonsspa
dc.relation.referencesFernández-García, M., & Martinez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker - non-native speaker synchronous discussions. Calico Journal, 19(2): 279-284spa
dc.relation.referencesGass, S. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.spa
dc.relation.referencesGass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross‐Feldman, L. (2005). Task‐based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55(4): 575-611spa
dc.relation.referencesGhazali Y., Parilah M. Shahb & Wan H. W. (2013) Cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies among Arabic language students. Interactive Learning Environments, MARA, Malaysiaspa
dc.relation.referencesGomez, J. (2011). Peer Interaction: A social perspective towards the development of foreign language learning. Profile Journal, 13, 189-204spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález Humanez, L. E., & Arias, N. (2009). Enhancing oral interaction in English as a foreign language through task-based learning activities. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 2(2), 1-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez Gutiérrez, D. (2005). Developing oral skills through communicative and interactive tasks. profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 6(1), 83-96spa
dc.relation.referencesHarmer, J. (2001). Mistakes and Feedback? The Practice of English Language Teaching. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limitedspa
dc.relation.referencesHymes, D. (1972). On Communicative competence, JP Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.) In Sociolinguistics: Selected readings.spa
dc.relation.referencesJamshidnejad, A. (2011, May). Developing Accuracy by Using Oral Communication Strategies in EFL Interactions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 530-536. doi:10.4304/jltr.2.3.530-536spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. White plains, NY: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesKemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Victoria, Australia: The Deakin University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesKurt L. (1997). Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. (pp. 301-336). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, v, 422 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesLightbown, P. M., Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesLyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 19, 37-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesMasrizal, M. (2014). The Role of Negotiation of Meaning in L2 Interactions: An Analysis from the Perspective of Long’s Interaction Hypothesis. Studies in English Language and Education, 1(2)107-116spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional, MEN (1999). Lineamientos Curriculares: Idiomas Extranjeros. Retrieved from http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles89869_archivo_pdf4.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional, MEN (2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Lenguas Extranjeras: Inglés. Formar en lenguas extranjeras: ¡el reto! Lo que necesitamos saber y saber hacer. Revolución Educativa. Colombia aprende. Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional, MEN (2016). Derechos Básicos de Aprendizaje: inglés grados 6º a 11º. Todos por un nuevo país. Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), pp. 409-429.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesNunan D. (1992) Research methods in language learning. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1993). Task-based syllabus design: selecting, grading and sequencing tasks. In G. Crookes and S. Gass (eds) Task and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Mattersspa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.spa
dc.relation.referencesO'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesOnatra, A., & Peña, M. (2009). Promoting Oral Production through the Task-Based Learning Approach: A Study in a Public Secondary School in Colombia (2nd ed., Vol. 11). Bogotá, Colombia: Profile.spa
dc.relation.referencesOsada, N. (2004). Listening comprehension research: A brief review of the past thirty years. Dialogue, 3, 53-66. Retrieved from www.talkwaseda. net/dialogue/no03_2004/2004dialogue03_k4.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. New York: Newbury House Publishersspa
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. L. (2011b). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, England: Pearson/Longmanspa
dc.relation.referencesPallawa, B. A. (2014). Conversation Strategies Used By Students Of The English Department Of Tadulako University. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora (JPH), 1(2), 159-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesPatterson, P., & Trabaldo, S. (2006). Negotiating for meaning across borders with CMC. Teaching English with Technology 6(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesPellettieri, J. (1999). Negotiation in cyberspace. In M.Warschauer, M. & K. Kern (eds), Network Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesPica, T., Kanagy, R., Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language teaching and research. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.spa
dc.relation.referencesPica, T. (1994), Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal About Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes? Language Learning, 44: 493–527. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.xspa
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. C. (2013, April). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33. doi: 10.1177/0033688212473293spa
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, H. A. (1994). The Ethnography of Empowerment – The Transformative Power of Classroom Interaction. (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications. Newbury Park, U.S.A.spa
dc.relation.referencesRocha, Y. F. (2006). Promoting oral interaction in large groups through task-based learning. Bogotá, Colombia: Profile 6.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Bonces, M., & Rodríguez-Bonces, J. (2010). Task-Based Language Learning: Old Approach, New Style. A New Lesson to Learn. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 12(2), 165-178.spa
dc.relation.referencesSamani, E., Nordin, N., Mukundan, J., & Samad, A. (2015). Patterns of Negotiation of Meaning in English as Second Language Learners’ Interactions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 16-25.spa
dc.relation.referencesSitko, N. J. (2013). Qualitative methods: Data analysis and validation. Paper presented at Zambia Food Security Research Project in support of the Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Lusaka, Zambiaspa
dc.relation.referencesSkehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. Cognition and second language instruction, 183-205spa
dc.relation.referencesSkehan, P., Willis, E. J., & Willis, D. (1996). Second language acquisition research and taskbased instruction. Readings in Methodology, 13.spa
dc.relation.referencesSomeren, W. M., & Barnard, F. Y., & Sandberg, A.C. J. (1994). The think aloud method. A practical guide to modeling cognitive process. London: Harcourt Brace & Companyspa
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sagespa
dc.relation.referencesStringer, E. T. (2007). Action research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesTuan, L. T., & Nhu, N. T. (2010). Theoretical review on oral interaction in EFL classrooms. Studies in Literature and Language, 1(4), 29-48.spa
dc.relation.referencesTulung, G. (2013). Oral discourse generated through peer-interaction while completing communicative tasks in an efl classroom (2nd ed., Vol. 24). Bahu Manado, Indonesia: TEFLIN Journalspa
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesWillis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (1996). A framework for task based Learning, Harlow, London: Longman AddisonWesley.spa
dc.relation.referencesWong, L., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learne (Vol. System 39, 144 - 163). Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.comspa
dc.relation.referencesYufrizal, H. (2015). Negotiation of meaning and language acquisition by Indonesia EFL learners. TEFLIN Journal-A publication on the teaching and learning of English, 12(1), 60-87.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadasspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/30024spa
dc.subject.keywordsInteractionspa
dc.subject.keywordsNegotiation of meaningspa
dc.subject.keywordsOral interactionspa
dc.subject.keywordsOral tasksspa
dc.subject.keywordsTask Based Learning Approachspa
dc.subject.proposalinteracciónspa
dc.subject.proposalNegociación de significadospa
dc.subject.proposalInteracción oralspa
dc.subject.proposalTareas oralesspa
dc.subject.proposalEnfoque de aprendizaje basada en tareasspa
dc.titleImplementing sociocultural interactive strategies to foster negotiation of meaning in oral tasksspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.dcmi-type-vocabularyTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Julie Milena Hernández Riaño (Tesis).pdf
Tamaño:
1.48 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: